Woolf Exhibition
And then there is “Virginia Woolf:
Art, Life and Vision,” the exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery, London, curated by
Frances Spalding. The exhibition catalogue had already been gifted us by a
friend, but because of the dates for our London
trip, we wouldn’t receive it till we returned home. So the show’s careful
planning, the choices made for it, were discovered firsthand, except for some comments
by previous viewers which we discovered beforehand, online and off.
The conscientious organization of
the material is welcome given the very full life it attempts to put on display.
Then—more than life it is a question of lives, a question of visions plural.
For Virginia Woolf and her sister Vanessa Bell (both nées Stephen) were the prime
movers of the Bloomsbury Group of artists, so that any reference to them
quickly generates views of their extensive circles. Born in 1882, Woolf’s is
one of those remarkable lives that link the Victorian age with the Modernist.
Think postmodernist is also modernist—the Bloomsbury
group of artists is also postmodernistic.
In terms of poetry, in terms of
vision, “Painting and writing have much to tell each other,” Virginia Woolf
tells painting and writing. It isn’t exactly that such a connection was previously
unknown. But I think the realist aspects of her fiction grow out of ideas like
this. Art and science have much to tell each other, she might easily have said,
given the highly allusive nature of her texts. Her references are like those I wrote
about here in regard to Julio Cortázar’s “The lines of the hand” (5 March 2014).
For that matter, Cortázar’s fellow Argentine Jorge Luis Borges translated
Woolf’s Orlando into Spanish. The growing Woolfian
palimpsest.
“Virginia Woolf: Art, Life and Vision” shows the chronological
development of Woolf’s art, her life, her vision, as they first touch those
hazy lines between modernism/postmodernism. The National Portrait Gallery
website includes a recording of Frances Spalding talking through parts of
it—well worth the time, oh yes.
No comments:
Post a Comment