Search This Blog

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

Sota la Ciutat




Sota la Ciutat

Written and directed by Llàtzer Garcia and performed by the Companyia Arcàdia, this piece—currently running at the Teatre Lliure (Montjuïc)—raises intriguing questions about who funds theater, what gets censored, the role of education, and talent—talent pure and simple. The play basically hinges on the comment of one of the characters, Narcís Munt, an aging teacher/director, to the effect that, rather as in Hamlet, “something is rotten in the Catalan theater.”
The opening scene peers into the lives of a young couple in a provincial town. They are trying to find their way into the theater world (she, Dàlia); or the world of novel writing and publishing (he, David). They struggle, they quarrel. Finally, they move to the metropolis (Barcelona), where everything is possible. One of their neighbors, Bàrbara Bonay, a successful painter and designer, befriends them and introduces them to her sister, Miriam, and Narcís Munt, her brother-in-law. Narcís agrees to mentor Dàlia as he attempts to kickstart his own career. There follows a series of rather bourgeois scenes of quasi-Bohemian joie de vivre leading up to a potential new role for Narcís at “the National.”
Predictably, he blows this chance by showing his outspoken disrespect for anybody who disagrees with him. Narcís is ready, in fact eager, to refuse to be hypocritical. Crisis thus returns. However, seeming resolution comes as “the National” accepts a new performance of his previously successful production of Godot.
But in the end it is curtains for Narcís. For we learn that he has died in mysterious circumstances. Dàlia bravely vows to fight on, nevertheless; and Bàrbara delivers a difficult elegy for the dead director whom her well meaning efforts had previously attempted to Apollonize or hypocritize.
The play ends there, but the questions raised in the course of the action go on. “Who’s watching?” is one of these questions. For the egoistic aspect of art so naturally welded to the idea of hypocrisy is bound to follow us out of the theater. And this seems to me an interesting issue to ponder in multiple hitch with “Who funds theater?” and “Where?” Llàtzer Garcia and the Companyia Arcàdia are no doubt aware of the impossibility of matching Godot’s nada, old or new, whether at “the National” or at any other venue. Yet (fortunately) they search on, exploring well under the city—Sota la Ciutat—where answers are notoriously elusive.
(Sota la Ciutat will be on at the Teatre Lliure de Montjüic until the first of May, 2016.)

Saturday, April 16, 2016

Hamlet at the Teatre Lliure


Hamlet



Sunday, 17 March, that is, tomorrow, marks the final performance of the 2016 Teatre Lliure version of Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Adapted and directed by Pau Carrió, the long Elizabethan drama is slimmed down to a scant three hour performance. So this production in Catalan has found ways to pare down both text and staging to an austere minimum. As to the latter, the multiple gray doors—mousetrap hammers?—on the (usually) brightly lighted stage are all that comprise the set. One of them, perhaps unwisely left ajar, even serves as “arras” behind which Polonius bites the dust. So many doors might be seen as invoking the multiple ways this well known Shakespearean piece can be (and has been) staged. Then there is the lighting, which at critical moments is left on above the heads of the audience, providing a metatheatrical scrim to spice up Carrió’s modern day dress presentation. The mirroring effect of the doors is, intentionally or not, echoed by the fact that some of the actors play two roles, although this could be another nod to austerity. As to the text, the dialogue is snappy, as it must be in a successful Hamlet, and true of course to the Lliure’s postmodernist conceptualization of Elizabethan wit. One may (this one did) miss the Players whom Hamlet convinces to deliver his Mousetrap lines as he baits the king he desires to kill. The absence of the Players is substituted by a reading (as opposed to a “play”). This is performed by some of the actors, providing still more doubling. And the result is of course the same as in more traditional Hamlets—Claudius spills his whiskey as he guiltily rises and rushes offstage.
A play this well known and so often and diversely represented obviously offers many challenges regarding both mise-en-scène and textual choice. One might, I think, quarrel with some features of dialogue delivery in this version. Possibly also with the outfitting of Ophelia’s tomb.  But the shortening of the text as well as its fast-paced delivery are sound. Some tickets may still be available… (link >>